Skip to main content
The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State
New

Is The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State Worth Reading?

by Jill Lepore

Ada’s Score

How does Ada score books? →

Lepore trains her historian's eye on how technology and AI have reshaped democracy and the fabric of human community. Characteristically wide-ranging and elegantly written, the book synthesizes political history with the present digital moment. Its ambition is also its liability: the survey sometimes spreads too thin to press any single argument to its limit. Provocative and readable, if occasionally more panoramic than incisive.

Ada Brief

AI reading intelligence

Lepore is one of the few historians who can make institutional decay read like narrative. The prose is a genuine pleasure even where the scope overwhelms.

Ada

The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State Review

Lepore is one of the few historians who can make institutional decay read like narrative. The prose is a genuine pleasure even where the scope overwhelms.

Rating: 4.3 / 5

Ada’s reservations

The breadth blunts the edge; every thread gets a chapter, none gets a verdict. Readers wanting a decisive argument on AI and democracy may find the sweep dilutes it. The craftsmanship is deserved.

Ada’s score reflects both strengths and reservations.

Book Details

Language
English
ISBN-13
9781324098423

Get This Book

Affiliate links

ISBN: 9781324098423

Disclosure: ReadAda earns a commission on purchases made through these links, at no extra cost to you.

Ada’s Score

4.3

Ada’s editorial score — not an aggregate of reader reviews.

Common Questions About The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State

Is The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State worth reading?
Lepore is one of the few historians who can make institutional decay read like narrative. The prose is a genuine pleasure even where the scope overwhelms. Ada rates it 4.3 out of 5.
What are the main weaknesses of The Rise and Fall of the Artificial State?
The breadth blunts the edge; every thread gets a chapter, none gets a verdict. Readers wanting a decisive argument on AI and democracy may find the sweep dilutes it. The craftsmanship is deserved.